The week of Monday June 23:
Second Amendment Ruling
The big news this week was the Supreme Court’s ruling that the Washington DC handgun ban was unconstitutional. The ruling, which was the first time the Supreme Court has weighed in on the second amendment, will have a big impact on the 2008 election.
The ruling gives us a direct comparison between the candidates themselves. McCain, like many Republicans, has been a solid advocate for an individual’s right to own a gun throughout his career. Senator Obama, on the other hand, has tried once again to take a pragmatic position after the ruling. It was clear throughout his career, and throughout the primary season, that Obama has been as anti gun as you could be. However, in a peculiar statement after the ruling, Obama claimed that he has always believe that the second amendment gave individuals the right to own guns and that he was happy that the court gave guidance on the type of laws that can be implemented to avoid crime.
Senator Obama is trying to jump towards the center on the issue, and with good reason. Obama failed to win primaries in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kentucky, all states that are have major support for the right to own a gun. Obama wants to challenge in those states, and it would be very difficult to do so while being against gun ownership. This issue is also big in Western states, like Colorado, where this election might just be decided. Obama does not want to jeopardize these states, and the Presidency, because of the gun issue. This whole ordeal shows that Obama is a very smart politician. He knows how to play the game. Maybe this will work, but it also could give McCain another piece of ammunition in his attempt to paint Obama a standard politician.
Second, this case also brought to the forefront the fact that the next President will have a major influence on the make up of the Supreme Court. This, in my opinion, could also help McCain. Social conservatives, who have not supported McCain in great numbers, do not want to waste their 20 + years of hard work that they have put in to make the Court more conservative. To keep the Court conservative, they will have to back McCain. If they don’t, they might lose out on cases involving abortion and marriage, which are most dear to them.
Seal of Disapproval?
Recently, the Obama campaign held an event that included an odd piece of art work. On the podium in which Obama spoke from, there was a seal that looked awfully close to the Seal of the President of the United States, except that it had Obama taglines and his website on it. Later, the Obama campaign admitted the seal was a mistake, and it has not appeared again.
Boy, was this ever a mistake. McCain, and other Republicans (Karl Rove), have been pushing this idea that Obama is an elitist. And what does Obama do, he goes out and gives them evidence to use. The seal could be interpreted in two ways. It could mean that Obama has a huge crush on himself or that Obama does not respect the office of the President. Either way, this does not bode well for Obama.
In many of the past elections, especially in recent years, Americans have shown the desire to elect a person who they consider one of them. They do not want to elect the man that looks down upon them, who thinks he is better than them. They do not want an elitist.
They also want someone who respects the office of the Presidency. While they do not want the man to be elite, Americans want the office of the Presidency to be elite. Americans will not tolerate a person messing around with the office’s image. For this reason, many argue that Clinton cost Gore the election in 2000. Many also say that Bush ruined the office’s image, which could cost McCain the election in 2008. Obama, in a way, seems to be denigrating the office by fiddling with the office’s logo.
Will this whole incident hurt Obama’s chances in 2008? Probably not, at least not by itself. However, it does give the McCain camp one more piece of evidence to support their argument that Obama is an elitist.
Courting Latinos
Obama and McCain drew headlines for their speeches to a Latino group in Washington DC this week. As mentioned earlier, the Presidency could be won in the west this year. That fact will make the Latino vote extremely important in this year’s election. In my opinion, this does not bode well for McCain.
The big issue for this group, of course, is the status of illegal immigrants. McCain has taken stances that have been seen as positive by Latino groups in the past. As a matter of fact, McCain and Obama would both support comprehensive immigration reform (This is still true for McCain even though he tweaked his position during the primaries). However, McCain still faces a disadvantage with this group and this is because of the Republican party.
The Republican party, instead of taking a pragmatic approach to the issue of illegal immigration, has taken a completely ideological stance that the American public is not really interested in anymore. Tom Tancredo and those like him have really hurt the Republican brand out West with their anti immigrant positions. Latinos will not put up with this and the could take it out on McCain, even though he does not belong to the Tancredo wing of the party. Considering that this population is growing extremely quickly, Republicans could regret their position on this issue for many years down the road.
McCain could be saved by the fact that Obama has some problems with this group also. Senator Clinton defeated him in many Southwestern states because of her overwhelming advantage among the group. It will be interesting to see if Obama can capitalize on the mistakes by the Republican party on the all important immigration issue. This is something we will have to focus on throughout the summer and the fall.